Acne scars are permanent textural changes resulting from severe acne. Effective remodeling requires accurate scar classification and a multi-modal approach combining topical agents, energy-based devices, and surgical techniques. Microneedling, subcision, lasers (CO2, fractional), and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) are primary interventions. Early intervention with topical retinoids like trifarotene can significantly reduce scar formation.
Addressing acne scars involves a personalized strategy based on scar type. Atrophic (depressed) scars are most common and respond to treatments that induce collagen remodeling and tissue lifting. These include microneedling (with or without PRP), subcision for rolling scars, fractional lasers (ablative and non-ablative), chemical peels (e.g., TCA CROSS for icepick scars), and dermal fillers. Topical retinoids can prevent new scar formation and improve existing texture.
Accurate classification of acne scars is the foundational step for effective treatment, as each type responds best to specific interventions.
| Scar Type | Description | Best Treatment Modalities |
|---|---|---|
| Icepick Scars | Narrow, deep, V-shaped indentations extending into the dermis. Resemble punctures. | TCA CROSS, fractional lasers, excisions, punch grafting [1] |
| Boxcar Scars | Round or oval depressions with sharp, vertical edges. Wider than icepick scars, resembling chickenpox scars. | Fractional lasers (ablative/non-ablative), punch excision/elevation, dermal fillers, subcision [1:1] |
| Rolling Scars | Broad, shallow depressions with sloping edges, giving the skin a wavy, undulating appearance. | Subcision, dermal fillers, microneedling, fractional lasers [2] |
| Atrophic Scars (General) | Depressed scars due to collagen loss during healing. Includes icepick, boxcar, and rolling. | Combination therapy with lasers, microneedling, subcision, fillers [3] |
| Hypertrophic Scars | Raised, firm scars confined to the original wound site. Less common with acne, more with body trauma. | Silicone sheeting, intralesional steroids, 5-FU, cryotherapy, pulsed dye laser (PDL) [4] |
| Keloid Scars | Raised, firm, shiny scars that extend beyond the original wound boundaries. Rare for acne scars, but possible. | Intralesional steroids, surgical excision (with adjunctive therapy), cryotherapy, radiation [4:1] |
| Intervention Type | Condition Treated | Outcome Measured | Efficacy | Certainty of Evidence (GRADE) | Key Findings & Caveats | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microneedling + PRP | Atrophic acne scars | Clinical improvement (>50% Goodman scale) | Significant improvement (OR 2.97) | Low | Superior to microneedling alone in reducing scar severity and improving patient satisfaction. Heterogeneity in PRP preparation is a limitation [5][6]. | [5:1][6:1] |
| Fractional CO2 Laser + Hyaluronic Acid | Atrophic facial acne scars | Scar severity reduction, patient satisfaction | High | Moderate | Effective for facial atrophic acne scars; combination with hyaluronic acid may enhance results. Ablative lasers require significant downtime and have higher PIH risk in darker skin tones [3:1][1:2]. | [3:2][1:3] |
| Subcision (monotherapy) | Rolling acne scars | Marked improvement (40-75% patients) | Moderate | Moderate | Effective for releasing fibrous bands tethering rolling scars. Often combined with fillers or PRP for enhanced, sustained results [7][2:1]. | [7:1][2:2] |
| TCA CROSS (100% TCA) | Icepick acne scars | Reduction in scar depth (>70%) | High | Moderate | Highly effective for narrow, deep icepick scars. Risk of hyperpigmentation if not performed by experienced clinician, especially in skin of color [8][4:2]. | [8:1][4:3] |
| Trifarotene (Topical Retinoid) | Atrophic acne scars | Reduction in total atrophic scar count | Significant (55.2% vs 29.9% for vehicle) | High | Once-daily application effective in reducing existing atrophic scars and preventing new ones, with results seen as early as 2 weeks [9]. | [9:1] |
| Overall Combination Therapy | Various acne scars | Overall clinical improvement across scar types | High | High | Multi-modal approaches (lasers, microneedling, peels, subcision, fillers) consistently superior to monotherapy for diverse scar patterns [3:3][4:4]. | [3:4][4:5] |
Acne scars arise from the skin's attempt to repair damage caused by severe acne lesions, particularly inflammatory papules, pustules, nodules, and cysts. The depth and duration of inflammation significantly influence scar type and severity.
The primary mechanism behind atrophic (depressed) acne scars is a net loss or disorganized deposition of collagen and elastin during the wound healing process.

For mild atrophic scars, or as a preventative measure and adjunct to clinical procedures, topical agents can significantly improve skin texture and reduce scar visibility.
For moderate scarring or to enhance results from the starter protocol, consider integrating more advanced at-home treatments.
For moderate to severe atrophic acne scars, in-office clinical procedures offer the most significant improvements, often used in combination.
Ineffective acne scar remodeling often stems from:
Monitoring progress is essential to optimize treatment and manage expectations.
Most true atrophic (depressed) or hypertrophic (raised) acne scars are permanent textural changes that do not resolve naturally without intervention. While post-inflammatory erythema (red marks) and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (dark marks) can fade over months to years, clinical treatments significantly accelerate and improve this process.
Microneedling is highly effective for atrophic scars (icepick, boxcar, rolling) by inducing collagen remodeling. However, for deep icepick scars, combination with TCA CROSS or punch techniques is often required. For hypertrophic or keloid scars, microneedling should be approached with caution and may require adjunctive treatments to prevent worsening.
Typically, 3-6 sessions of professional microneedling are recommended, spaced 4-6 weeks apart, to achieve significant improvement in atrophic acne scars. The exact number depends on the scar severity, individual healing response, and whether adjunctive therapies like PRP are used.
Downtime for laser resurfacing varies significantly by type:
Zhang M, Liu C, Zhang S, Chu R, Ren X. Advances in the treatment of acne scars. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 29;12:1643035. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12425707/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Ahramiyanpour N, Khosravi-Shahi M. Subcision in acne scarring: A review of clinical trials. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Dec;22(12):3211-3220. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36315903/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Zhu X, Song X, Zeng Z, Li S, Fu X, Zeng M, Li Z. Optimal treatment options for acne scars in patients with historic acne: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2024 Jul 12;22(1):285. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12515001/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Garg V, et al. Practical Aspects of Acne Scar Management: ASAP 2024 Consensus Recommendations. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 28;13(7):1858. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11003649/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Kang YJ, et al. Combined Effect of Microneedling and Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Acne Scars: A Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 22 Feb 2022;9:788754. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8882957/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Juhasz ML, et al. Platelet-rich plasma use for treatment of acne scars: an overview of systematic reviews. Blood Transfusion. 2023. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11073618/ ↩︎ ↩︎
Al-Dhalimi MA, Arnoos AA. Subcision for treatment of rolling acne scars in Iraqi patients: a clinical study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2012 Jun;14(3):149-53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22672279/ ↩︎ ↩︎
Bhardwaj D, et al. An Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of CROSS Technique with 100% TCA in the Management of Ice Pick Acne Scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010 May;3(2):87-90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2956965/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Kircik LH, et al. Trifarotene Reduces Risk for Atrophic Acne Scars: Results from A Phase 4 Controlled Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;13(12):2757-2769. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10689318/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
El-Fakahany E, et al. Microneedling in the treatment of atrophic scars: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Sep;20(9):2775-2782. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8450803/ ↩︎
Pickart L, et al. GHK peptide as a natural modulator of skin regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:647659. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4508379/ ↩︎
Vasquez R, et al. Noninvasive Cosmetic Treatments for Fitzpatrick IV–VI: A Narrative Review of Safety and Efficacy Guidelines. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 22 Dec 2023;16(12):19-27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13012588/ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎
Rapamycin News. Rapamycin and Surgery. 2022 Nov 19. https://www.rapamycin.news/t/rapamycin-and-surgery/540 ↩︎